I'm looking for three years the value of homework for TV that fits in my budget and I'm glad they had expected, and much research. Now I have an incredible quality television, not throw me in the next three years. As mentioned above, this review should, for those who are on the ground to be able to follow. I agree to read the post editor, and can not fully with him. I bought LG 47LH50 price, this TV at BB for $ 1200 at the door. In comparison with other models, I noticed the other time when TV pixelated shots again, not particularly in the face of very close, where the television format. I later learned that television is one of the fastest on the market in 2.7 milliseconds. The darkness of the black level seems very dark for me, depending on the shipment. He noted, is near, I'm just using an antenna, I was sitting in my attic, a white square foot "digital" ants I bought for $ 50, even more significantly. I live in downtown Memphis, so the quality is pretty good translation, and most buy LG 47LH50 the best price for local stations in 1080i. The image quality is better than my parents three years ago exponential top Toshiba HD. My DVD player only supports 1080i, but all the new movies I had rented an amazing picture. See Standard Def TV, at least so far, and even better than expected. (About the same quality as HD shows my parents), the initial configuration of LG is bright, too bright and lively, cheeky. I tried to imagine the editor of changes, and found it too soft and dull. Edit After weeks of fighting with the ridiculous amount of pictures, now I have written in your personal tastes. I have a bright living room has a TV, my main reason for the purchase of the LCD, speaking, this model had a glimmer of everyone else on the screen. Another point I disagree with the opinion of the editorial angle. Even in my light I can sit and off-axis and the brightness does not drop that much. Watching a football game, I can really say if I buy at the best price for LG 47LH50 an e-champion is left or right, because I can see clearly where the ball spirals, but in slow motion. Of course, image quality was better games with much more expensive, especially the new LEDs. It's really clear about the vicinity. Perhaps my biggest beef with the picture quality is about blurring the leading characters in very close and very far away, when the quality of translation is not enough, and yes, we can say a television in another. I noticed most HD brackets are exaggerated while positive signals, a bad signal. I understand that as a problem in the products of high quality entertainment. Same with audio. LG 47LH50 Buy at the best price All said and done, considering that I am soooooooooooo looking forward to different TV, and almost made the mistake of wasting money on television that the bombing was as bright as his name the screen itself (not the intrusive power of the light the LG can be enabled or disabled), I'm pretty excited to write my first review. When you extra money, and you're terribly anal about prices ICP LG Tower 47LH50 quality a little too expensive. If you are connected, as I obsessed with the best that you get a reasonable price, it is. Really impressive.
Updated January 3, 2010
Updated January 3, 2010
